Dear Editor,
Out of the jurisdiction, but vehicle used in the committal of an alleged crime. That demands answers and explanations. While he may not be personally involved in the actual execution of the alleged initial harassment of a citizen, which went awry and turned deadly, the fact that personal property was involved, it can be perceived would make the owner complicit, and raises serious questions about involvement.
There has been no claim the vehicle was stolen to commit the act. Lots of questions, no answers, but only cries of recklessness. Police bulletin.
The compelling, searching question is: how were the executioners able to get hold of the vehicle when the owner is out of the country? It gets weirder with the finding of the vehicle parked in a yard in which the owner of the vehicle and occupant of the yard know each other.
Funny situation. The bulletin should stand.
Sincerely,
Shamshun Mohamed
