Condemning sectarianism and misguided religious dogma

Dear Editor,
It is with grave concern that I address the divisive and inflammatory remarks made by someone claiming to be a Muslim Scholar on social media regarding the President of Guyana, Dr Irfaan Ali, and his participation in a religious event. The previously stated post is a perilous attempt to promote sectarianism in our multicultural society in addition to being a shameful misinterpretation of Islamic principles. Under the cover of Islamic piety, such discourse appears to be a perversion of the principles and values of Islam.
The author of the post falsely claims that attending a Hindu religious event constitutes an act of idolatry, an assertion that is both theologically incorrect and politically reckless. Furthermore, it is a blatant and stupid insult that reveals the author’s ignorance of Islamic teachings to say that President Ali is an apostate and that just because his name “sounds Arabic,” it does not mean that he is a Muslim. Islam is about beliefs and practices, not names. As the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) stated, “Verily, Allah does not look at your appearance or wealth, but He looks at your hearts and deeds.” Did the author of this post look into the President’s heart?
On Wednesday, President Irfaan Ali joined the Badrinauth Ashram and Triveni Mandir of Brampton, Ontario, Canada, to inaugurate a 50-foot murti of Shiva, one of the principal deities in Hinduism.
The President’s attendance at the ceremony was an act of diplomatic and interfaith respect, not a religious endorsement. It is deeply ironic that the author of the post attempts to sow division while ending his statement with the hashtag #worldpeace—a contradiction of his malicious intent. True world peace cannot be achieved by promoting sectarianism and disrespecting the religious choices of others.
The Qur’an itself sets a precedent for respectful interfaith relations, as seen in Surah Al-Mumtahanah (60:8): “Allah does not forbid you from being kind and just to those who have not fought you because of your religion or expelled you from your homes. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly”. This verse calls for treating non-Muslims fairly, especially regarding social and diplomatic interactions.
The Treaty of Hudaibiyyah, a crucial pact between the idol-worshipping Quraysh of Mecca and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), is among the most obvious illustrations of Islam’s dedication to interfaith harmony and cooperation. This contract established a standard for amicable interaction with non-Muslims and demonstrated diplomacy, respect for one another, and conflict resolution despite their religious differences. How is it possible to defend criticising a modern leader for promoting harmony and respect across many religious communities since the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) maintained similar agreements with the non-Muslim Quraish? Despite their religious differences, this treaty exemplified diplomacy, mutual respect, and conflict resolution, setting a precedent for peaceful engagement with non-Muslims. If the Prophet himself upheld such agreements with the non-Muslim, Quraish, how can anyone justify condemning a leader today for fostering unity and respect among diverse religious communities?
Furthermore, the reckless invocation of ‘Nawaaqiz’ (nullifiers of Islam) is deeply troubling, as it aligns with the extremist ideology of Takfirism—the practice of declaring fellow Muslims as apostates. Muslim scholars of both the past and present have condemned anyone for making Takfir, as it is considered an extreme position in Islam, and they have rejected it. Islam teaches humility, wisdom, and restraint in matters of faith, and no individual has the right to declare someone else a non-believer without clear and undeniable proof.
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself attended the gatherings of non-Muslims, engaged with Christians and Jews, and upheld treaties with polytheists. Once, the Prophet stood in respect for the funeral procession of a Jewish man. When questioned, he responded, “Was he not a human soul?” Who are we to condemn If the Prophet of Islam, the most revered figure in our faith, could display such dignity and respect for other religions?
Moreover, the attempt to juxtapose Hindu Ministers’ absence at Eid al-Adha slaughter events with the President’s attendance at a Hindu event is both illogical and disingenuous. Respecting others’ religious sensitivities is not a sign of weakness but rather a demonstration of one’s commitment to peaceful coexistence. The Prophet (peace be upon him) never made anyone observe or take part in activities that went against their religious persuasions. Demanding such reciprocation is an indication of insecurity and ignorance rather than piety.
This social media post is most alarming because it attempts to undermine national unity and pit religious communities against each other. At a time when our country is striving to build bridges between different faiths, voices like these seek to tear them down. Islam is a faith of justice and mercy, not division and hatred.
Also, posts like these do not just misrepresent Islam—instead, they actively encourage disrespect for it and provide fuel for Islamophobes. Such irresponsible statements can be used by those who seek to malign Muslims and justify their prejudices.
Although the author may have removed the post, this is not enough, and he needs to formally apologise publicly for his reckless statement. He should also be reported to the Ethnic Relations Commission (ERC) for investigation in light of the seriousness of his actions. People who try to incite hatred and discord in our community must be vehemently opposed. Since they have proven incapable of upholding the values of respect and unity, such individuals should not be allowed to hold leadership positions or participate in public discourse.
As the President of a multicultural country, Dr Irfaan Ali must represent all of its people and his attendance at a Hindu religious event does not betray Islam or degrade his beliefs. Instead, it supports the principles of national unity, tolerance, and leadership. Those who spread discord in the name of religion should remember the Qur’anic warning: “And do not mix the truth with falsehood or conceal the truth while you know it.” (2:42).
To the author of this divisive post, I say, “Fear Allah and restrain your fingers. Your reckless rhetoric does not serve Islam—it only serves to divide and create enmity among people. If you genuinely care about the religion, reflect on the scholars’ wisdom rather than indulging in self-righteous condemnation”.
Let’s reject extremism and embrace the peace, knowledge, and respect for all that are the fundamental tenets of Islam.

Sincerely,
Shazad Sookram