Appointment of Chancellor, CJ
…regrettable top judicial positions not substantively filled
Some 20 years after Guyana’s Constitution was amended to facilitate the appointments of top judicial officers by the President with the agreement of the Opposition Leader, Attorney General and Legal Affairs Minister, Anil Nandllall said it is “regrettable” that there is yet to be a substantive appointment of a Chancellor and Chief Justice (CJ).

In 2001, Article 127 (1) and (2) of the Constitution was amended to have the President make appointments to the top judicial positions after obtaining the agreement of the Leader of the Opposition. However, there have not been any substantive appointments made in over a decade to fill those posts.
Currently, Justice Yonette Cummings-Edwards is the acting Chancellor while Justice Roxane George is the acting Chief Justice.
“As Attorney General, I find this position where these two Judges have been acting for so long and their positions have not been confirmed for so long as regrettable. It was never intended by the framers of the Constitution for these two offices not to have been occupied by confirmed appointments,” Nandlall told reporters on the sidelines of an event recently.

Cummings-Edwards
The AG pointed out that the requirement of agreement between both the governing and Opposition sides to make the appointment has failed to work under several Administrations over the past 15 years.
“I have had the privilege of sitting in meetings between former President [Donald] Ramotar and then Opposition Leader David Granger, where President Ramotar went at great lengths to attempt to get the incumbents at the time confirmed – those were Chancellor (ag) Carl Singh and Chief Justice (ag) Ian Chang. All President Ramotar’s entreaties then were rejected,” related Nandlall, who also served as AG from 2011 to 2015 in the last People’s Progressive Party/Civic Administration.
With a similar failure to make the appointments in the last five years under the APNU/AFC coalition, Nandlall posited that this constitutional amendment may need to be reviewed.
“When we are going to consider constitutional reforms, we should consider whether we should change it again because Guyana, as you know, is the only country in the Commonwealth that has this provision and we have great difficulty filling it,” he asserted.
