Dear Editor,
In response to the claim that Vice President Jagdeo is ignoring corruption in GuySuCo and the Ministry of Agriculture, I must disagree. While concerns about the sugar industry are legitimate, the challenges GuySuCo faces stem from decades of mismanagement, inefficiencies, and global shifts in sugar demand.
Blaming Jagdeo for failing to address corruption assumes that reforms and recovery efforts are simple when, in fact, they are complex and require time. Additionally, accusing him without providing concrete evidence undermines the constructive dialogue needed to move forward.
Efforts have been made to restructure GuySuCo, including re-opening estates, promoting agricultural diversification, and securing funding for modernisation. While progress may be slower than expected, the government’s willingness to engage in these reforms reflects a commitment to reviving the industry rather than turning a blind eye to corruption. Broad accusations do not advance solutions. Instead, what’s required is more transparent, fact-based engagement to address specific areas of concern and ensure accountability.
In conclusion, criticism is vital in holding public officials accountable, but it should be rooted in facts, not broad generalisations. The future of GuySuCo requires thoughtful, constructive efforts from all stakeholders, rather than dismissive rhetoric that fails to acknowledge the full complexity of the situation.
Sincerely,
Fawaz Harry
