Embattled former Public Infrastructure Minister David Patterson, already in hot water over revelations his agencies bought expensive jewellery for him, will today face a Magistrate over his role in sole-sourcing a company to design a new Demerara Harbour Bridge.
Former Public Infrastructure Minister David Patterson
This publication understands that Patterson, the current Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), will appear in the Magistrates’ Courts today. This comes after he was questioned on Friday by investigators at the Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU) and charged with attempting to defraud the Demerara Harbour Bridge Corporation (DHBC).
Head of SOCU, Superintendent Fazil Karimbaksh had confirmed to <<<Guyana Times>>> on Friday that both Patterson and Adams were called in for questioning in the ongoing probe. It was reported that Patterson’s visit to SOCU’s headquarters lasted about 10 minutes and he was accompanied by his lawyer.
Patterson was once cleared in 2019 by investigators from SOCU when it comes to the sole-sourced contract to Dutch company Lievense CSO for the design and feasibility study of the new Demerara River bridge.
But both the Public Procurement Commission (PPC) and the Auditor General had red-flagged Patterson for requesting from the then Cabinet that the feasibility contract be sole-sourced instead of being processed through the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board (NPTAB).
The PPC had found that after the bidding process was annulled because of non-responsive bidders, NPTAB had approved for the project to be re-tendered.
Back in November of last year, Public Works Minister Juan Edghill had disclosed that the Guyana Police Force was actively probing the award of the 2016 $145 million contract to LievenseCSO,
The Minister said the investigation follows a formal complaint to law enforcement. The then Opposition PPP/C had requested that the Public Procurement Commission (PPC) investigate the award of the contract.
The party had sought to hold the David Granger Administration accountable for sole-sourcing the contractor, rather than following the procurement laws. The PPC completed its investigation and handed its report over on August 7, 2018. The report noted that several companies had bid for the project to do the feasibility study and design for the new Demerara River bridge and 12 companies had been shortlisted.
The report had added that only two of the 12 companies had made proposals. As such, the bidding process was annulled. It further noted that on November 12, 2016, the Tender Administration Board approved the move for the project to be re-tendered. The project was not re-tendered; instead, LievenseCSO was engaged by the Public Infrastructure Ministry to do the work.
Page seven of the report noted that the bid from LievenseCSO was “unsolicited”, but Patterson took the company’s proposal to Cabinet for approval, and Cabinet granted its approval for the company to be engaged.
The report, on page seven, also stated that monies to be spent on the project were taken from the asphalt plant accounts. Reports indicate that in 2017, $215.3 million was used from the fund, while in 2018 a further $74 million was withdrawn. The original sum approved by Cabinet for the contract was $161.5 million. It is understood that the contract price for the handpicked LievenseCSO was actually $148 million.
