Deceptive messages that were meant to create mayhem

Dear Editor,
I will begin my letter by making reference to the infamous statement made following the loss by the PNC-led Coalition in the 2020 Elections. “Tell we something that we want fuh hear.”
That statement was directed to Granger after the APNU/AFC had lost the election but had yet been tenaciously holding on to power. That statement was pellucid: “Though we (PNC lost the elections) we would like to hear the erroneous declaration that we have won”.
And so it has always been: a party and a people who never accept the truth, but keeps harping on the lie to get their way through.
In light of the above, let us analyze the Adrianna drowning death matter. Now that the pathologists have given their verdict, that the death of this little girl was by drowning, family members and their accomplices in the Opposition are yet hell bent on promoting the lie that she was murdered.
It was with the same emotionally and politically charged backdrop that they greeted the verdict of the pathologists. Should the family and political friends accept the qualified decision of the three independent pathologists, or hang on to the lie? They chose to go forward with the lie.
And herein lies the crux of the case, and I begin at the beginning. Here we have a family outing at the hotel with a grandmother and aunt as guardians of the flock.
Swimming in the pool was the main activity. The police were not there, the commissioner was not there, the hotel manager was not there, “Jagdeo” wasn’t there in the pool with them. At the end of the swim, little Adrianna came up missing. Who or what were the circumstances that led to her coming up missing is our concern. Let’s pick it up from there.
The theory of the guardians, notably the aunt, was that someone abducted her and went into the inner part of the hotel to commit a satanic ritual. She claims that this had been done before.
The grandmother’s testimony was altogether another concoction of the same, with a slight twist to the story. Granny said that she sent Adrianna off to buy snacks, which eventually led to her abduction.
Now, the point I am making is that the testimony of both adults focused on a possible abduction and a seance taking place inside the hotel, murder being the final outcome. That testimony would later turn out to be a vicious and malicious lie when the autopsy was given.
My question is: Where were the guardians when all of this was taking place? Did they see a man abducting her? And who was that man?
Well, they first said it was the hotel’s owner, who was not there (So he had to have conducted his voodoo by remote). Later, they blamed the owner’s son for her demise.
In all of the explanations, the guardians never made mention that Adrianna might have gone under when they were frolicking in the pool; which is very much the case, because the little girl drowned.
My firm belief – and this is substantiated by the forensic pathologists’ evidence – is that the little girl went under, and I am saying the aunt and grandmother KNEW IT, but for political expediency, they hid that fact.
This is what led to the mayhem that followed the false and misleading statements by the guardians, who were out to deceive. The police need to take action. That is, the two should be charged and interrogated forthwith. They need to account for what transpired while they were in the pool. They were present at the scene, and must state emphatically what took place.
Likewise, the idiot police who, maybe out of frustration, made the comment that “She left with a man in a black and red Raum vehicle.” He, too, must be hauled in for questioning in regard to the source of his information.
They all should be charged. The forensic report is in, and now is the time for intense investigation and charges to be laid. We cannot hide our heads in the sand and pretend that this did not happen. We cannot sweep this under the rug; if we do, it is bound to raise its ugly head again.
The aunt, who is very vocal, even insulted the president with her lies when she accused him of holding violent protests, capitalizing on the political platform she was setting up.
Well, she now has the opportunity to defend her story by telling us what she saw, heard, and witnessed at the scene.
I saw the politician Mr Figueira making an emotional call for the establishment of an Adrianna Alert after the dead child. However, I would like to remind him that this girl died by drowning, and not murder, lest he conveniently forgets! There was no foul play, no voodoo anything of that nature, so why then couldn’t we establish A Lusignan Alert, where 11 lives were lost (Many of them children in their sleep) as a result of brutal murder by persons whom Opposition elements supported!
Only Black lives matter? Come on people, stop this nasty politicization of the girl’s death.

Respectfully,
Neil Adams