Dear Editor,
Throughout history, society has seen the emergence of individuals who champion the cause of representing the underrepresented and voicing the concerns of marginalized communities. These individuals often become vocal critics of others, particularly those actively engaged in tangible efforts to create positive change in the communities and in people’s lives. However, a troubling pattern often emerges, in that while these self-proclaimed representatives of the people excel at rhetoric, their actions rarely match their words.
I must say that those who genuinely make a difference must remain steadfast in their efforts despite criticisms.
Many individuals who engage in what might be called “performative representation” position themselves as advocates for the disenfranchised. They often speak eloquently and passionately, using their platforms to criticize others who are actively engaged in real efforts to bring about positive change. However, their focus remains on rhetoric — talk and more talk — not on action. They seem more concerned with appearances, attention, social validation, and social media likes, shares and comments than with effecting meaningful tangible outcomes. This can be seen in various sectors, from politics to social justice movements, where the loudest voices often belong to those who contribute little beyond words. Most times, they pop up like unwanted mushrooms and buzzing mosquitos whenever there is an issue that is gaining public attention.
Linden, like other communities, has some of those characters who are domiciled, and others who live out of the township, region, or the country’s jurisdiction.
This phenomenon, I believe, stems from a mix of envy and jealousy. Seeing others take meaningful actions can evoke feelings of inadequacy or resentment in those who are unable or unwilling to do the same. So, criticizing those who are actively doing things for the people they claim to represent and care for becomes a defence mechanism, a way to shift attention from their own shortcomings. By focusing on the perceived flaws and mishaps of others, these critics deflect attention from their lack of tangible contributions, their non-tangible ineffective doings.
The good book speaks of envy and jealousy as powerful motivators for criticism, especially when directed at those who achieve what others did not or cannot. Individuals who talk without action often feel threatened by those who do more than talk. They see the accomplishments of others as a reminder of their failures, their own inaction, fuelling their desire to tear down those who succeed. In this way, their criticisms become a manifestation of their own insecurities.
This type of envy-driven behaviour is especially problematic when it comes from those who claim to represent others. Their jealousy leads them to undermine those who are actually helping, making it harder for real change-makers to succeed. The energy that could be directed towards constructive efforts is instead wasted on negativity, creating a toxic cycle that ultimately harms the very people they claim to represent.
Hypocrisy is a defining trait of these individuals. While they criticize others for perceived failures, they often fail to hold themselves to the same standards. They may accuse others of not doing enough, all while avoiding any meaningful action of their own. This double-standard is particularly evident when they attack those who are making genuine efforts to help.
These critics tend to focus on the faults of others, no matter how minor, while ignoring or downplaying the positive impact those individuals have. This selective criticism reveals their true motives: it is not about representing people or creating change, but about maintaining their own status and relevance. They prioritize their own self-image over the wellbeing of the communities they claim to serve.
To the doers, I say: despite the criticisms and negativity you may face, your genuine engaged efforts in helping others must remain steadfast. The work you do is invaluable, and your actions speak louder than any rhetoric. While it can be disheartening to face unwarranted criticism, it is essential to recognize that such negativity often comes from a place of envy and insecurity.
Change-makers should focus on the positive impact they are making, rather than being distracted by those who criticize without contributing. Your work is what truly matters, and your actions will ultimately speak for themselves. The best response to empty rhetoric is continued action and dedication to the cause. By staying committed to your efforts, you can overcome the negativity and continue to make a real difference in the lives of others.
The call to action is clear: focus on tangible, meaningful and impactful change, and let your actions be the true representation of your commitment to others.
Yours respectfully,
Jermaine Figueira,
MP
