Flippancy with a COI creates a very sick aura

Dear Editor,Dear Editor,Quite interesting would be the findings as well as the recommendations of this COI into the assassination plot to kill the President of Guyana. Very interesting reading it would be, because what is gathered from the questioning or interrogation, can be descrived as a big charad. For a matter of such grave importance to treat with such flippancy with a COI creates a very sick aura, of this Government. A matter of such magnitude, or one that has serious implications, that is – the assassination of The head of State – should not be treated so lightly as a Commission of inquiry.Like I indicated in an earlier letter COI’s cannot prosecute anyone, they can only make recommendations, the powers of prosecution are vested in a court of law, which I am absolutely sure would have gotten to the bottom of this “so-called” plot. So let’s just take a look at some of the findings of the COI:1. Would there be a total disregard for the tainted shady characters that are involved and the so called evidence emanating from such sources? Only time will tell.2. Andrif Gillard’s testimony of being presented with a “Big, Long, Black gun,” whereas Khan is the licensed firearm holder of a Taurus weapon, a totally different make of a firearm from the “Long, Big Black rifle”. Is it a figment of his imagination?3. The allegation that the police did shoddy work.  Well, the facts tell a different story.   The police did investigate the alleged assassination statement of Gillard and found that he is a “professional con-artist who had motive to make treasonable comments about Khan.  Gillard owes  Khan huge sums of money which he cannot repay, hence his assassination claims. From all indicators, this COI is fast tracking into a “Blame the Police” game which might very well see a massive shake up Police Force.
Sincerely,Neil   Adams