…says project makes sense from an economic perspective
By Jarryl Bryan
When it comes to the economics and the potential benefits that Guyana would reap from a gas-to-shore project, finance professor and recent contributor to the Local Content Panel, Floyd Haynes said that the project is quite feasible and can usher in a new era of economic development.

Floyd Haynes
In an interview with this publication, Haynes spoke of the potential benefits of the gas-to-shore project being pursued by the current People’s Progressive Party (PPP) Government. He explained that with the reduced cost of producing power, the project can usher in economic development as manufacturing costs decline.
“First, there will be a reduction in the cost of energy, which is immediate. The cost of energy is one of the major cost inputs to any kind of manufacturing or production activity. What you’ll find is that the cost of energy is probably the most expensive component. Now if you can reduce that cost of energy, you’ve essentially reduced the cost of producing that product,” he explained.
“Which means the price of that product is also reduced. And you can then sell that product at a more competitive price. So that’s the first thing. There is a cost savings that will ultimately lead to a reduction in the price of manufacturing services. Secondly, there is a direct relationship between energy and economic development. Because if you can reduce your cost of energy, it means you can jump-start economic activity which in turn leads to economic development.”
Haynes, an adjunct professor in finance, further explained that economic development is dynamic and that there is a multiplier effect whereby increased production leads to increased development and more jobs, with the trickle-down benefits felt in households and communities. He also noted that there are other value-added products that could be derived from the natural gas process, such as propane.
There have been concerns about the financing of the project. However, Haynes pointed out that based on existing reports, the project would be financed through Exxon’s cost pool. He also urged persons to look at the issue in a comprehensive manner and to weigh the potential return on the investment.
“You have to look at both sides of the equation when you’re looking at an investment. And the way you do that is you look at the future benefits, you discount the future benefits from present value and you compare it to investment. And if the present value of future benefits exceeds the investment, then the investment is a good one. And that’s the kind of analysis I think has to be done,” Professor Haynes said.
