…says misallocation is root of economic hardship
Government’s refrain that it cannot afford increases for teachers may need to be revisited; as Opposition parliamentarian and economist, Irfaan Ali, is contending that just by slashing recurrent expenditure, there can be a surplus of $3 billion for the year.
According to the former Minister, there were increases in at least six-line items since 2014 that directly contribute to a 55 per cent increase in total recurrent expenditure.

These are security services, an increase of 41.9 per cent; dietary, an increase of 44.4 per cent; national and other events, increased by 91.5 per cent. Other transport and travel, 62.5 per cent; transport and travel, 48.6 per cent and employment costs, 41.9 per cent.
“Specifically, employment cost makes up $17 billion or 39 per cent of total increases in recurrent expenditure. If excess budgetary allocation, $2 billion, is slashed from dietary and national events to 2014 levels, the Government would be able to rehire and offer a 66 per cent increase in stipend to the 1972 dismissed Amerindian CSOs; increase the (National Toshaos Council) subvention to $50 million and provide each Amerindian village with a $3.5 million cash grant.”
Ali also suggested that if excess allocations to security services and transport and travel were returned to what it was in 2014; initiatives like the ‘Because We Care’ cash grant to students could be reinstated and even increased to $15,000 per child.













