Dear Editor,
According to media reports, Minister of Natural Resources, Raphael Trotman, has said that notwithstanding a refinery was not feasible, the Government would have to take a political decision, as many benefits expectedly will accrue to Guyana and Guyanese. The Minister’s statement follows the presentation made by the consultant who had examined the feasibility of establishing an oil refinery, and it is indeed appropriate. It is pleasing to note Trotman’s approach to oil, but at the same time I recognise that the Administration is not taking an even approach to all sectors and areas of national life. While the investment in a refinery is seen as possibly a worthwhile project despite the negative economic conclusions, we see that in the sugar industry a completely opposite approach is being taken. Sugar is recognised by all and sundry for the diverse role it plays, yet the Government, in spite of the compelling evidence and arguments, has — for whatever reason — chosen to shun the industry and promote plans for its miniaturization, which will surely have negative consequences for tens of thousands of people.
I urge the minister and the Government to examine sugar in the same way it does oil. After all, sugar is already a tremendous economic advantage for the country. An objective and sincere examination of sugar will reveal its importance to the nation at this time, and the need for its support, and not its destruction.
Yours sincerely,
Patricia Persaud