How credible is ‘credible’, or how valid is ‘valid’?

Dear Editor,
After an attempt to rig the election on March 3 before local as well as international observers, it was agreed upon that we shall have a recount of the votes. That recount reasserted what was on the original SoPs which show a clear win for the Opposition PPP/C.
The recounted SoRs for all ten administrative regions were credible and were stamped under the certified seal of GECOM as valid votes. Those valid, certified, credible – whichever term you would like to affix to it – showed the Opposition PPP/C winning the election by some 15,416 votes. I am talking about the winner PPP/C 233,336 votes and the loser incumbent APNU/AFC 217,920 votes. The empirical evidence before us shows that the PPP/C is emphatically or undeniable the winners of the March 2, 2020 elections.
It is now the statutory duty of the Chief Elections Officer to go through the formalities of tabulating those votes and presenting same to the Chairwoman of GECOM for declaration and the swearing-in of the winner. Instead, the CEO took upon himself to sit with his comrades at Congress Place and alter the figures and present these to the Chairwoman. Now my question is this, why did the Chairwoman countenance such a report in the first place? From the moment Lowenfield presented or attempted to present such a report, he should have been met with a warrant for his arrest.
What the CEO did was barefacedly sourcing a fraud, that is, falsifying or tampering with publicly certified documents. This constitutes open fraud and should have been dealt with jail time, swift and condign. Why toy around with a public officer who is deeply steeped in fraud, one who is resolutely poised to place his political party in office come what may? That answer can only be made by the Chairwoman, Retired Justice Claudette Singh, who from all appearances seems to go along with this foolishness.
How can a public officer vest unto himself powers that make him the Judge as to which votes are valid and those that are not? Who gave him such powers, are his votes valid, stamped and verified by the Commission? How can valid certified votes be discarded and the valid ones discarded? This is reprehensible, and if this is not fraud then what is?
To add to this asininity, a politically-aligned Court of Appeal then gave credence to Lowenfield’s foolishness by rewriting the Constitution inserting the word “valid” before votes to be counted. This is utter trash and should be rejected forthwith.
I guess the next question will be, how credible is credible, is it 100 per cent, or 75 per cent or 25 per cent, which is it? Questions and more questions? Then, we should ask ourselves why have elections in the first place when a single person in the CEO can alter an election to suit his own personal wishes? I rest my case.

Respectfully,
Neil Adams