– fishing around for “Yes Men”
Dear Editor,
They fired the family lawyer; they fired their own family doctor, who was present at the autopsy; they also refused to accept the irrefutable evidence of three internationally-renowned pathologists. This tells anyone, even if you have half a brain, that this family is on a political road, out to make the little girl’s death a homicide.
The politics was meant to pull the ruling party in that net and show that they were part and parcel of a voodoo plot to “sacrifice” Adrianna.
It is an election year, and their actions bear the signature stamp of the PNC, both before and after elections.
You will recall the Courtney Crum-Ewing case: he was killed three days before the election; and the Henry Boys case: they were killed soon after the PPP/C took office; you will recall the same voodoo messages and the widespread death and destruction that followed. Do all these things had their attachments to the PPP/C?
So, the Adrianna Younge case comes as no surprise to us; but I will come back to this issue in another letter to the editor.
So, the intellectual authors are behind this new move by the parents, there is no doubt about that. They are not going to let this little girl’s soul rest in peace. They want their lawyer, family physician and the wider community out there to stifle their conscience and garbage the comprehensive, qualified, scientific, conclusions of the pathologists that it was a homicide. Not going to happen!
The family and their political advisors are now on a desperate fishing expedition to find yes men and whatever bits and pieces of hearsay testimony that could corroborate their homicide story. They are no longer in a “finding out the truth mode”, but are in the mode wherein they are willing to accept a lie. This is a dangerous place to be, because it means that all decency and respect for law and order are thrown aside just to fulfil the egotistical ambitions of a power-obsessed Opposition and its acolytes.
So, let us, for discussion purposes, accept the theory that this girl’s death was a homicide. Then we would have to discard forthrightly the professional diagnostics of the three doctors who did the autopsy. Next, we would have to accept every “voodoo” hearsay testimony being circulated. Persons drown each year at pools and resorts around the country, is this a case of voodoo?
What about that elderly gentleman who drowned turned right-side up, Adrianna’s drowning was faced downwards. Does that look funny?
Other hearsay testimonies: such as the hotel worker wheeling a trolley with a white bundle inside, that could be Adrianna, you know? Or the man standing on the balcony of the hotel waiting to throw the body into the pool? Or, greater still, Adrianna being abducted by the hotel owner/manager and taken into an inner room with double walls and a tunnel to be sexually molested in a satanic ritual?
In all mercy and truth, this is an enormous pill to swallow, much more to get circumstantial “factual evidence” to prove it. So, this is the position we have gotten ourselves into: that is, whether to believe the indisputable truth or swallow the big pill of deceit and lies. I think civilized and right-thinking people would choose THE TRUTH. I rest my case.
Yours sincerely,
Neil Adams
