Guyana’s Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Ministry on Wednesday raised concerns about the inconsistency in the remarks being made by the Venezuelan Ambassador to Guyana regarding the visit of United States (US)-sanctioned and indicted Guyanese businessman, Nazar “Shell” Mohamed, to the embassy in Georgetown.

Back in August, Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Minister Hugh Todd expressed concerns over the Mohameds’ frequent visits to the Venezuelan Embassy in Georgetown. Weeks later, video evidence emerged showing Mohamed leaving the Venezuelan Embassy earlier that month.
At the time, Todd said he had summoned Venezuela’s Ambassador to Guyana, Carlos Amador Perez Silva, to a meeting on the issue, and the diplomat indicated that Mohamed “visited the embassy to apply for visas to go to Venezuela, specifically Caracas” – something which the Foreign Minister noted is alarming in light of recent concerns raised by at least two US Congress members over what they described as Venezuela’s attempt to influence internal affairs in Guyana, specifically through the younger Mohamed.

Nazar and his son, Azruddin Mohamed, the latter of whom founded the We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) political party that contested the September 1 elections in Guyana as the presidential candidate and is now on the verge of entering Guyana’s Parliament as the Opposition Leader after his party secured 16 seats to become the main opposition, were previously sanctioned along with several of their businesses and were recently indicted by the US for gold smuggling.
But now, the Foreign Ministry has called out the Venezuelan diplomat for changing his remarks on the matter, questioning, “…why the Ambassador is being secretive about the visit of Mr Nazar Mohamed to the Embassy of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela regarding a visa application.”
During a recent interview with a local newspaper, it was reported that neither Mohamed, the father, nor the son had been to the embassy – something which, the Ministry said, stands in direct contradiction to the Ambassador’s earlier account during the meeting with Minister Todd.












