Oil and gas consultant, Charles Ramson Jr has pointed out a glaring oversight on the part of the Guyana Government, when it renegotiated an agreement with oil company ExxonMobil back in 2016. According to Ramson, it is an oversight he contends can contribute to costing Guyana massive amounts of potential revenue.
According to the consultant and former parliamentarian, the agreement is void of any position on decommissioning an oil well once the oil and gas is extracted. This, he noted, means Guyana will lose out because oil company can claim these expenses as part of its “cost oil” cut.

ExxonMobil is expected to use revenue from its production in order to make back its capital investment. This will be categorised as “cost oil”. Whatever remains of this is the ‘profit oil’ Guyana will have to split between the oil company and its associates.
Ramson related that back in 1999, when the original agreement was entered into before any commercial quantities of oil was discovered, the importance of decommissioning was not recognised as a priority.
“The focus was on exploration and production and how to get more revenue which is very similar to the Guyana situation at the moment. Globally, that has now changed significantly especially for mature basins.”
He added that decommissioning involves the safe plugging and abandonment of the hole drilled in the earth’s surface from which oil and gas is extracted and the safe disposal of the equipment used in production.
In offshore production, such as where Guyana’s well is located, the costs can range in the region of a few million dollars to over US$500 million per oil and gas reservoir for which plugging, and abandonment is one of the highest cost factors – representing about 60 per cent of the total decommissioning cost.
The attorney referenced a United Kingdom (UK) oil and gas authority report published in 2017. According to Ramson, the decommissioning costs in the UK continental shelf are estimated to be approximately US$80 billion, exceeding net tax revenues.












