Reckless decisions made with devastating consequences

Dear Editor,
If there was no lifeguard on duty, then the pool should have been closed to the public, in the teen-drowning incident at the resort.
Likewise, the teen, who could not swim, should not have been allowed to enter the pool.
Responsibility for the tragedy lies on both sides, with reckless decisions having been made with devastating consequences: for management of the resort for allowing the use of the pool without the mandatory lifeguard; and for the relatives, for knowing there was no lifeguard on duty, yet throwing caution to the wind, and, at their own risk and peril, allowing a non-swimmer to enter the pool.
My condolences are extended to the family and relatives.

Sincerely,
Shamshun Mohamed