On May 26, Guyana once again commemorated the “Independence” that was given to the PNC Government by the British in 1966, after engineering the latter’s victory in the Dec 7, 1964 elections. But 1964, and specifically May 25-26, 1964, also marks a rupture in the history of Guyana, and, more specifically, the history of the relations between African- and Indian-Guyanese, which needs to be bridged.
The political competition between the African-Guyanese- based PNC and the Indian-Guyanese-based PPP segued from the “sweeping out the PPP with brooms” in 1961 elections through the burning and looting of Indian businesses in Georgetown on Black Friday, Feb 16, 1962, and the spread of tit-for-tat ethnic violence and arson across the Demerara Coast after the 89-day Public Service 1963 (April 18-July 5?) and Feb 17-July 27 GAWU strike of 1964.
The culmination was the pogrom against Indians of Wismar-Christianburg on May 25-26, following the murder of an elderly African couple aback Buxton. 220 Indian homes were razed, two Indians were murdered, several women and girls raped, almost the entire Indian population of 3000 was forced to flee. Six weeks later, the explosion of the Sun Chapman launch on July 7 killed 43 of the all-African passengers headed towards Wismar from Georgetown. The retaliatory killing of five more Indians who had returned or stayed behind at Wismar was almost an anti-climax. The Inquiry into the bombing of the Sun Chapman found its causes to be “inconclusive”, while that into the Wismar Pogrom declared it to be “politically and racially inspired”.
I use “Silence” in the tradition of Rolph Trouillot: “…an active and transitive process: one “silences” a fact or an individual as a silencer silences a gun. One engages in the practice of silencing.” But the rupture of the silencing of the history of the period needs to be rectified, if for no other reason than allowing the survivors of those events to express their grief about their experiences. It is quite possible that the reason for the silence about the period may be because the political leaders “wanted to move on”, but in the new millennium, there were some who evidently thought otherwise.
One such person is David Granger, who referred to the inter-ethnic violence of the 1960s as the “disturbances” and “the troubles”. In a 2003 paper, (Hurricane of Protest – The Impact of Civil Violence on African-Guyanese in 1964”) without ever mentioning the preceding Wismar atrocities, he wrote, “The most alarming slaughter of the ‘Disturbances’ was that of 40 Africans on 6 July at Hurudaia in the Demerara River as they travelled in a motor launch to Mackenzie.”
The following year, a “Son Chapman Tragedy Commemoration Committee”, with the PNC integrally involved, organised a 40th Anniversary event at the fatal spot at Hurudaia on the Demerara River. Robert Corbin, leader of the PNC, said, “A nation that fails to record its history is bound to make the same mistakes.” After Granger became the leader of the PNC in 2011, he attended the now annually observed Commemoration ceremony, and declared he wished more people would converge at the spot. The Motto on the Monument at Hurudaia declared: “Those who forget the lessons of history do so at our own peril.”
In 2013, Granger and the PNC initiated moving the commemoration to the centre of Linden, so the people there “would not forget”. The PNC kept this promise, and on July 6, 2020, did so without once mentioning the Wismar ethnic cleansing of Indian-Guyanese, as the PNC representatives bemoaned the “pain and hurt” of the survivors. But Dr Alissa Trotz and Red Thread also interrogated the purpose of this commemoration, and queried the silencing of the preceding tragedy of the violence and ethnic cleansing of Wismar. They interviewed many of the refugees from Wismar, living on the East Coast of Demerara. Like the survivors of the Sun Chapman, their loss is also palpable.
We cannot undo the past, but we simultaneously, from our present, should have our eye on our future – a future we hope to create with the knowledge gleaned from the past. For me, it is a future in which all Guyanese can live in peace to create their progress, and not be manipulated to a return of that past.
I have long proposed we should erect a memorial for all the 176 Guyanese who perished in the 1964 disturbances and need restorative justice.
