‘Survey’ with 20% response rate cannot reflect Guyanese views on electoral reform – Teixeira

…says IRI ‘findings’ lack integrity

Parliamentary Affairs and Governance Minister, Gail Teixeira said ‘findings’ from the national public opinion poll conducted by the International Republican Institute (IRI) on Guyana’s electoral reform lack integrity and do not reflect the views of Guyanese.
Teixeira said that any poll conducted in Guyana that involves humans, must go before the Health Ministry’s Ethics Committee. In this regard, no request was made nor approval granted, the DPI reported.
On April 13, 2022, the IRI revealed its ‘findings’ from data it claimed was collected here between January 4 to 24, 2022, which state that a high per cent of Guyanese believe electoral reforms are necessary.
According to the body, the poll was conducted in all regions of Guyana, through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. The IRI claims that the samples consisted of some 1500 Guyanese adults with a response rate of 20 per cent.
Teixeira in the DPI report stated that a survey conducted with a 20 per cent response rate cannot answer for all Guyanese, noting that after thoroughly assessing the survey, it only leaves one to consider whether the questions were asked in a way persons could clearly interpret.
She stressed that one must be convinced that a survey is done according to ethical, scientific and technical issues and that the methodology and the integrity of the survey must be above board.
“We are concerned how it is managed and because of COVID-19 that whether other means of ensuring that the sample that was used effectively so that people in Guyana between January 4 and 24, who were being sampled were able to answer,” the Minister noted.
Teixeira pointed out that 11 per cent of the sample, equivalent to 165 persons above 18, reported that they are not registered to vote in an election, while a further 29 per cent said they did not vote in the 2020 elections.
“So how can you be coming up with a survey response that says that people were not registered to vote when in fact, they were below the age of 18. These are questions that come up when we look at the responses in the document,” she stressed.

The Minister added that there is a whole host of odd questions in the survey, pointing to one which asked about whether people would vote in the Local Government Elections regarding the candidate.
“Well first of all we don’t have Local Government Elections, and secondly because elections haven’t been called for Local Government Elections, one doesn’t know who the candidates are or who they will be, so how do you know how to answer that question?”
They were questions also on whether persons believed there was voter discrimination which, Minister Teixeira deemed, “very ambiguous”, explaining that “voters’ discrimination and voters feeling that someone may have discriminated against them, by making comments on an ethnic basis are not the same thing.
Voters’ discrimination is very specific in its meaning where they don’t have access to the ballot, they don’t have access to the polling station, because they are being prevented from doing that based on the function of the Guyana Elections Commission and the way the polling stations were managed on election day,” she added.
And there were no such claims of persons being discriminated during the March 2020 General and Regional Elections, the Minister pointed out. In fact, the observers had declared the day as peaceful.
The document disclosed that four per cent of the samples was taken from Region One, six per cent from Region Two, 14 per cent from Region Three, 42 per cent from Region Four, seven per cent from Region Five, 15 per cent from Region Six, two per cent from Region Seven, two per cent from Region Eight, three per cent from Region Nine and five per cent from Region 10.
With Region Four occupying the largest space on the IRI survey’s geographical map, Government is yet to locate at least one of the persons who participated in the exercise, the Minister noted.