Yesu Persaud: an exemplary life well lived

Dear Editor,
Namaste! It was the late sixties; Guyana had just achieved political independence in 1966; Guyanese celebrated the idea that they could now determine their own system of government, choose how they dress, and which religion or way of life to follow.
But internal struggles surfaced to continue the pre-independence divisions. Academic qualifications and experience took a back seat to party membership, which determined employment, promotion, demotion, or even dismissal from Government departments.
A few “freedom fighters” decided that wearing a tie to work was an unnecessary appendage of the “white masters”. After all, they lived in a cold climate, while we reside near the equator and have summer all year long. Why should they impose their cultural dress on us, as they did with their religion? However, with all the zeal of Inspector Javert in Victor Hugo’s classic Les Miserables, men and women of all colours threatened Government workers of all races that they would be disciplined and would be considered improperly attired if that yoke did not hang around their necks.
Enter Yesu Persaud, who had just qualified and returned from England immaculately clad in a black pin-striped suit with tie, and even a black umbrella. The contagious smile was omnipresent. Another Englishman, the boys whispered. It was not long before the “revolutionaries” and their colonial henchmen reached a compromise as suggested by one who would become a master negotiator.
“Make it optional, not compulsory; there will be no need for enforcement, and more will comply”.
A short while thereafter, all male Government workers sported shirt jacks. Thomas Paine, in his Common Sense, described the Government as a “necessary evil.” It can stifle initiative in any country anywhere on the globe. This may be one reason why Yesu ji quickly departed, joined a private enterprise, and never looked back.
Hundreds of thousands choose to leave the country to find security, employment, or to escape persecution; but he remained to make an indelible impression that should find a prominent place in the history books.
About four decades later, we met again at Saraswati Vidya Niketan, the private Hindu school which considered him “family”. The school was in its infancy, and there was a need to encourage enrolment and assist those who needed financial assistance. The Jung Bahadur Singh Scholarship was one of the first to be set up, and then others followed. At an event prior to the first CXC results, Yesu ji announced a similar scholarship in the name of his grandson, and spoke to those in attendance.  “Whatever you achieve, wherever you go, whatever you own, BE HUMBLE.” He made it his duty to assist that school, but also to be present at every event and graduation. When he was not seen in the 2021 virtual graduation ceremony, current administrator and former student Kamanie ji anticipated our curiosity and explained that he was not well. Anyone acquainted with him and the Bhagavad Gita would recognise that this devotee not only practised humility, but also lived a life free from LUST, ANGER and GREED. (Gita: 16-21).
He achieved both material and spiritual success. One would have to struggle to find anything he needed or a gift that he appreciated.
While he treated people of all races, religions and social groups with equal respect, and practised the “golden rule”, he never hesitated to let the public know that he was born a HINDU, and has remained one throughout his life. He was always active in promoting the values inculcated from childhood. His early days were not different from those of anyone who was born and grew up in a logie or sugar plantation. The distinction is the path he followed and choices he made to reach the pinnacle as a businessman and humanitarian. His life can be compared to that of the lotus, with roots in mud, stems pushing through dirty water, but blossoms into a beautiful flower that is adorned by all as the seat of the goddess Saraswati.
His departure leaves a huge void, particularly in the Hindu community, and it would be a challenge to find a substitute. There can be no replacement for one with such an impressive record of activity and generosity.
Those who are remnants of colonial hegemony, and who continue to follow inimical practices of cultural and religious superiority, now need to re-examine their views. Is it still too difficult to admit that Yesu ji was one of those exemplary persons produced by every religion, and that any attempt to convert others is unnecessary and downright disrespectful?
Yesu ji has achieved much in his life, a fact well documented. His business interests will no doubt be passed on to those he trained and trusted. However, his admiration for Mahatma Gandhi inspired a request to have a street named after this venerated soul. This has not yet materialised, and the suggestion has generated some conflict as to location.

Namaste,
Ramnarine Sahadeo