Cane cutters’attendance a significant achievement

Dear Editor,
The GAWU welcomes Mr Jonathan Yearwood’s letter – “To what extent are GuySuCo and GAWU cooperating in order to turn around the industry?” – that appeared in the local media on July 13, 2021.
Indeed, like Mr Yearwood, the GAWU was heartened to learn that the industry netted $734M more than anticipated though realising 70% of its anticipated production. It demonstrates that the GAWU is correct, and the sugar industry has every potential to be turned around and become viable.
Certainly, we believe that with other ventures we have referred to in the past, even greater rewards could be reaped.
Mr Yearwood questions whether our Union is supportive of the reality that around 70% of cane cutters are availing themselves to work daily. Maybe it is the case that the letter writer is not familiar with the sugar industry, but the turnout statistic described is a significant achievement.
Mr Yearwood would well know that cane cutting is a laborious task, and one that exacts a significant toll on cutters. Certainly, it is difficult, given the hardships of the task, for all the workers to be present every single day. Cane cutters may wish they could be present at work daily, especially given that they do not obtain year-round employment; but, at the same time, they are not, by any means, superhuman. While, with the advent of mechanical loaders, the onerousness has lessened on the workers and this has contributed to increased productivity, it yet remains a challenge for them to wake up in the wee hours of the morning to travel several miles into the cultivation and cut and load several tonnes of cane day after day. The fact that cane cutters can regularly accomplish such a feat is testimony to their commitment and sheer strength and will.
The letter writer urges the GAWU to encourage more workers to turn out daily. As a responsible organization, we do advise sugar workers to avail themselves at work. But while calls are heightened for workers to present themselves during the cropping periods daily, during the off-crop periods, the workers are confined to four days’ work per week, sometimes with tasks that are taxing and which they are unable to complete within their allotted work time.
The point we wish to make is that there must be some equity when speaking about workers’ attendance to work. Maybe the Corporation, with its strategy, can seek to address workers’ pay, which sees some of them earning just a bit over $2200 per day. Certainly, any worthwhile improvement can play a meaningful role.
Finally, we agree with Mr Yearwood that the target is attainable. If you ask us, given the industry’s potential, it is low, but we recognize, too, where the industry is coming from. While the workers will seek to play their role, it requires several other factors to align as well.

Yours faithfully,
Seepaul Narine
President
GAWU