Is Kaieteur News only interested in pushing one side of this story?

Dear Editor,
Reference is made to certain sections of the media in response to my letter – penned in the Stabroek News captioned, ‘Questions for Minister Patterson’ – by one Leroy Nelson.
Two interesting facts, Kaieteur News chose to publish a response to my letter – that was published in the Stabroek News – but failed to publish my letter in the Kaieteur News in the first place.
Is this normal editorial practice? I thought the principle demands that all sides deserve a fair hearing? Or is Kaieteur News only interested in pushing one side of this story by pushing some letters and stalling others? What are the real objectives of the editorial team at Kaieteur News on this matter? Is there a design to muddle the issue and to cover for the Minister?
But secondly, I found it interesting that Nelson believes my intentions have unique designs and I want to reassure him that he is correct. I, like many other Guyanese, would like to know if Derrick Patterson had facilitated Guyanese State supported access to the port of exits by way of a VIP Pass or any other preferential treatment because of his relationship with a serving Minister of the Government.
I am told every day that the security controls at the ports of exit in Guyana are of a very high quality and thus the opportunities to beat the system should be very low. Such a situation raises the two issues – either Derrick Patterson was one lucky person or he had help and if so, where did this help come from. That is my design, Mr Nelson, getting to the truth.
If we have a Minister and Cabinet official demonstrating fidelity to accountability and the rule of law, then clearly he can provide answers to the questions to reinforce these principles of transparency and accountability and set the record straight.

Yours truly,
Sasenarine Singh
Maryland