Violating rights of fellow Guyanese rather than accepting truth

Dear Editor,
The alteration of the vote count per party list by GECOM pushed the turnout in some areas to surpass the actual amount of registered voters on the voters’ list eligible to vote at some of these polling stations. As a real example, there is box 4082, which was situated in the village of Herstelling. On the statement of polls, the amount listed for the APNU was 14 votes but the GECOM official called 114 votes, which if tabulated would have caused 112% of the person on the official voters list to be voting. That translates to some 12% phantom voters all called by GECOM’s official Mr. Cummings as voting for the APNU. That is fraud, and is a criminal act on the part of GECOM.
But why is GECOM and the PNC, by way of their candidate Ulita Moore, trying to deny the nation a complete, accurate and valid recount of the ballots? The table below will expose why. This table outlines some of the results in the PPPC strongholds as ascertained from Statements of Poll that are in the possession of the Chief Elections Officer of GECOM, Mr. Keith Lowenfield.
From the table, it can be seen that the PPPC won handsomely some key areas in Region #4, and the more significant of them are on the East Coast of Demerara. For example – Mon Repos/Good Hope/Lusignan. In this area, there were some 13, 556 persons on the voters’ list, but only 75% or 10,161 persons actually voted. Of those 10,161 persons, 93% or 9,451 voted for the PPPC, while a paltry 580 persons, or 6%, voted for the APNU.
This is what GECOM and the PNC folks in Congress Place do not want to count, because of the impact of these votes on the outcome of the elections.
The same story continues at Enmore/ Foulis, where 88% or 4,439 of the actual voters voted for the PPPC. Even in the Amerindian villages of St Cuthbert’s and Waiakabra on the Linden Highway, the PPPC trounced APNU by winning 74% and 75% of the valid votes. What was surprising was that in his own home town of Pearl, the PPPC gave him a shellacking by winning 60% of the votes, while Team Granger was only able to scrape 38% of the votes.
So, when the facts are revealed, the only persons deluding themselves in these elections would be Mr David Granger and his supporters, who are prepared to rig an election and violate the rights of their fellow Guyanese, rather than accept the truth.

Sincerely,
Sase Singh