What made President Granger think he can outrun the law?

Dear Editor,
Retired Justice James Patterson, the illegally appointed Chairman of GECOM, has finally vacated his post. This is a commendable act, and I say: “Enjoy your retirement years in peace”.
This gentleman, in his golden years, was made to suffer ridicule and shame by his president, who, for 20 long months, dragged him through the mud, all because he was a willing participant in a grand scheme of things. However, that has all ended.
We are accustomed to the cliché “all good things must come to an end”; however, conversely, all bad things must come to an end, and that ‘bad thing’ is Mr Patterson, who had to go.
Now, as much as I ridiculed Mr Patterson for being so obstinate in allowing that illegal process to take root for so long, my sternest rebuke is for Granger; he is the one who crafted this great fraud, and he is the one whom we will castigate.
Mr Granger, what made you think that you could outrun the law of the land? The inevitable was always there as a stern reminder lurking at every turn: the supreme law of the land must be adhered to. Mr President, you cannot outrun the long arm of the law. It finally caught up with Mr Patterson, and it will also catch up with you.
In this regard, we turn our gaze on you, Mr President, and I use this term with great reluctance, because, in the present circumstances, you are an illegal occupant yourself. So, I say to you, Mr Granger, you are next in line. We are looking forward to you being in strict compliance with Article 106 (6) and (7). In less than a week, we expect your full cooperation with this aspect of the Constitution. There should be no further delay, the world is watching!

Respectfully,
Neil Adams