Why did Norton avoid questioning the international community on issue of an installed PPP/C Regime?

Dear Editor,
I listened intently as Opposition Leader Aubrey Norton reported to the nation in his weekly press briefing. He was talking about his recent engagement with members of the international community.
He began with the rehashed script of Guyana being again blacklisted as a narco-state, and he tried desperately to make a connection between the many drug busts and the PPP/C, but that ruse never really got off the ground.
What Norton fails to tell the people is that: now, with an independent and well-organised crime-fighting Police Force, drug busts can be effected; unlike their time in office, when the Police were instructed not to make arrests of known drug lords, or were prohibited from investigating such crimes. This appalling scenario Norton will forever defend.
Further to our discussion is the fact that the largest drug-trafficking bust was made soon after the PPP/C assumed office in 2020. I make mention of The Marlon Primo shipment of 11.5 kilograms of cocaine (The largest shipment to date) from a Guyana port. So, these are questions or issues Norton should have raised with the eminent persons of the international community, but he did not. Interesting!
Norton rambled on into the area of “extra-judicial killings”. He was trying very hard to hide the real hardcore issues.
But the central theme of our discourse is the fact that Norton, either by intent or simply because he knew full well what would have been the response by his audience, did not broach the matter of an illegal PPP/C Government taking office here. Norton failed to ask the pointed question: Why did the international community install the PPP/C to office? I think this should have been the main focus of his meeting with them. Why did the ABCE countries ever endorse the results of the March 2020 Elections in favour of the PPP/C, and not the APNU/AFC Coalition? Why should such an atrocity be countenanced by the international body?
The monstrosity of such an act should not have been sidelined by Norton; rather, it should have been the first item on his agenda discussion. But Norton is no fool, he knew well in advance that the international body was there at the rigging party, and took every last detail of the attempt. So, rather than embarrass himself with a straightforward, no-nonsense answer like, “You were the intellectual authors of that rigging plan,” he simply shied away from the question.
To think that a matter like the installation of an illegal Government in Guyana, which is so near and dear to the heart of the PNC, could have been glossed over like that at an international forum simply eludes me!

Respectfully,
Neil Adams