…failed to consider economic impact
The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) on Tuesday heard legal arguments seeking the reversal of the Eugene F Correia Airport name change on the grounds that the move is anti-competitive and moreover, that the former APNU/AFC Government did not adequately consult with those affected.
Lawyer for Air Services Limited Devendra Kissoon argued before the CCJ for the revocation of the name change. During the virtual hearing, Kissoon argued that the former Government failed to consider the economic impact the name change would have on other operators in the airport.

Devendra Kissoon
Kissoon also read documents suggesting that former President David Granger and former Public Infrastructure Minister David Patterson had committed to addressing the concerns that were raised soon after the idea to rename the airport began floating around.
However, the lawyer contended that this was not done and that the former Government failed to meet the threshold for consultation with those who had the most to lose, thus violating common law principles attached to consultations. Rather, all the consultations occurred in the Ogle Airport Incorporated (OAI) board room, where most of them do not have a seat.
“There is a letter written by former President Granger to the representative of the applicant, on December 2nd, 2015, where he states that he is aware the Minister of Public Infrastructure has undertaken to ensure that the airport is administered efficiently and in the public interest. So the administration of the airport is in the public interest,” Kissoon explained.

“The majority of the applicants are small private operators whose livelihood depend on the fair management of Ogle airport. And make up nine out of the 10 domestic operators currently in Guyana. Save for three of them, none of them are Board members of OAI, but are simply arm’s length lessees of the space OAI provides to aircraft operators. And all compete for the market.”
The lawyer further contended that the Correia Group of Companies and the applicants in the case have historically had a strained relationship for the very reason of anti-competitive practices that include the name change.
Kissoon in his submissions made it clear that as per the lease, the airport is a public one, with Government as a major stakeholder. Hence, there was a duty to consult with all the operators and not just those on the OAI Board who overwhelmingly represent Correia Group. He, therefore, urged the court to issue orders paving the way to reverse the name change.
